";s:4:"text";s:30250:"To view our latest e-Edition click the image on the left. Brandt testified about how, as an adult, she deals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and constant nightmares. In most states, the jury is instructed to consider both objective and subjective factors. Again, Ohios cap on non-economic damages is unreasonable and arbitrary. 29-39-104. Do we have unlimited freedom of speech today? This goes along with what we have said in the past: medical malpractice lawsuits are not the problem. People who caused less serious injuries would be fully responsible for the entirety of the victim's losses, whereas those who caused more severe injuries would benefit from the limits placed on non-economic damage recovery by their victims. But, more importantly, AT&T's request for summary judgment made a determination of the constitutionality of the law before jury deliberations necessary. Code Ann. In connection with all of the rules for which it has responsibility, the Supreme Court generally solicits public comment before adopting new rules or amendments in final form. hospital, one of our offices 0000078503 00000 n
The plaintiff filed a constitutional objection to the noneconomic damages cap. Readers might recall a tremendous amount of turmoil in the years leading up to this legislative change related to a purported "medical malpractice insurance crisis". On appeal, Dr. Go raised an issue that the trial court erred by excluding evidence of free or low-cost medical care that could be provided to the child. Unlike procedural rules, rules of superintendence do not have to be submitted to the General Assembly to become effective. The U.S. Supreme Court has not decided whether statutory caps on damage awards in medical malpractice cases are constitutional. Should there be caps on damages in tort cases? 2021-0497, BUILDING PERMITS: Week of January 9, 2023, NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR TITLE 14 GUARDIANSHIP OF A MINOR, CVG-23-00408: LINDA KRAFT vs RACHELLE KRAFT, Et Al, Notice to bid for the furnishing of all materials, tools, and machinery in accordance with the plans and specifications for the 2022 Bridge Repair Program ~ Sturbridge Road Bridge #3086 Rehabilitation, Fraud free in 2023: AG Yost launches 'Charitable University' to help protect Ohio nonprofits, Lucas preventive admin legal fee-DD2020- (0 bytes) () 01/18/2023 postreply 07:27:47 0000002410 00000 n
Thomas held that there was no compelling state interest to abridge the right to a jury trial, and ruled the law was unconstitutional. Some state high courts have examined the constitutionality of caps, while others have not. And some states have re-passed caps after their courts found them unconstitutional, often making the constitutionality of such caps unclear. With that in mind, the following is a general rundown of current state laws that cap compensatory damages. [3] The rationale for capping noneconomic If you believe you may have a Florida medical malpractice claim you need to speak with an experienced medical malpractice attorney, in order to comply with Floridas pre-suit investigation requirements, and the strict time limits involved. The procedure for obtaining review of a claim of disqualification against an appellate or common pleas judge is commenced by the filing of an affidavit of disqualification with the Clerk of the Supreme Court. Lawsuit Challenges Application of Caps to Child Victims. Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to continue reading. Defense lawyers moved to reduce the noneconomic damages award to $750,000, the maximum compensation for trailer
<<0101398BF6AE4D128A2A73BE57ADA6B5>]/Prev 1004274>>
startxref
0
%%EOF
109 0 obj
<>stream
If you get selected to be a jury member in one of these 30 states with responsibility caps, your thoughts on how the victim should be compensated can be completely disregarded. 2315.18(B)(3).. Sorry, there are no recent results for popular commented articles. He raped and abused Brandt in 2004 and 2005. The Supreme Court is the court of last resort in Ohio. He wrote the Court ruled 15 years ago in Arbino that these caps are constitutional, and Brandt has not presented sufficient evidence to overturn that decision. 1988) ($500,000 cap for damages in medical malpractice actions violates States open courts guarantee); Waggoner v. Practice Areas Where malpractice resulted in death, Floridas wrongful death statute applied. The 2-1 ruling harkened back to an insurance dispute from 2013. Ohio Supreme Court Rules Tort Damage Caps Unconstitutional in Child Sex Abuse Cases December 25, 2022 Hannah Poling The Ohio Supreme Court ruled recently Tort damage caps unconstitutional when applied to sexually abused children Law Limits Damage Awards to Personal Injury Victims. Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution sets the size of the Court and outlines its jurisdiction. Phoenix, AZ 85016, About $14 million representedcompensatory damagesfor acts that occurred before April 2005, when S.B. In other words, having state legislatures place arbitrary limits on how much (or how little, for that matter) an offending party in a lawsuit can pay is unconstitutional meddling. 0000001704 00000 n
Or is what you went through worth more than that? The implication of Judge Websters ruling is that a legislature empowered to limit the damages awarded by courts could also set those limits at zero dollars and have the limit apply to economic damages, such as medical expenses, lost income and property damage. One would be hard pressed to find an accident victim who would take a million dollars for a lifetime of being unable to using ones extremities or being unable to take care of ones own basic needs. Responsibility cap laws in Oregon, Washington and Oregon have been removed from the books, and at the time of this writing a case is pending in our own state of Maryland that contends that the cap on non-economic damages is unconstitutional. Judge Webster focuses not on the nature of the existing damage caps in Mississippi but on the implications for the power of the legislature to effectively eliminate Not every case will qualify as medical malpractice. Phone: (602) 258-0646 about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Lastly, Thomas was skeptical of the law's arbitrary choice of $750,000 as the damage amount. 0000008394 00000 n
Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. For no cost or obligation, you can speak to our lawyers and get free legal advice and understand what your options are. Mississippi currently has a one million dollar damage cap on non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering and impaired quality of life. Lawsuit Challenges Application of Caps to Child Victims. After high school, she lost a job due to anxiety, self-medicated with heroin, was homeless for a period, and attempted suicide. It was told not to use any mathematical formula to determine compensation for pain and suffering and was told it was solely within the jurys discretion to determine an amount of damages. Webdamage cap statutes unconstitutional either altogether or in certain circumstances.5 Other states, like Mississippi, await decisions from state high courts regarding the Terms of Service apply. Tennessee's law capping "pain and suffering" damages is unconstitutional, a state judge has ruled. Rules of superintendence over state courts set minimum standards for court administration. Brandts mothertestifiedthat, after the abuse, her daughter isolated herself and experienced severe anxiety and anger issues. Constitutionality of Caps on Medical Malpractice Damages Pros and Cons of Limiting Damages for Medical Malpractice. 0000010774 00000 n
We ensure the confidentiality and protection of all details of your case. Because of this law, the district court reduced the award to a total of $9.7 million: $6 million in non-economic damages and $350,000 to each of the Beasons. However, statistical studies by law professors and the Department of Justice have found that punitive damages are only awarded in two percent of civil cases which go to trial, and that the median punitive damage award is between $38,000 and $50,000. Sorry, no promotional deals were found matching that code. 0000004042 00000 n
2315.18 unconstitutional as applied to her case. But it is not our role as members of the judicial branch to determine what compensation is necessary or adequate. Twenty-nine states currently have tort reform that places a cap on malpractice damages that have so far survived constitutional challenges. Most of its cases are appeals from the 12 district courts of appeals. The point of a damage cap is to help the economy. WebKANSAS SUPREME COURT RULES DAMAGE CAPS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL On Friday, June 14, 2019, in a major decision that significantly alters the law and the landscape of personal injury litigation in Kansas, the states supreme court ruled in a 4-2 decision that Kansas long-standing, statutory caps on non-economic damages is unconstitutional. Previously, the 4th district court had also found monetary caps to be unconstitutional in a 2015 case. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. The third procedure at the medical center required a permanent electric stimulator, which is used to treat chronic back pain. On December 21, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Lindenberg v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company that this damages cap is unconstitutional under the Tennessee Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Do not complete this field. According to NPDB data, the state of New York had the highest total medical malpractice payments, totaling $7.025 billion followed by Pennsylvania, with $3.416 billion. First, stare decisis and the courts reliance on Arbino demanded affirmance, Justice Fischer maintained. Prior to this decision, the Utah legislature amended the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act to impose damage caps in medical malpractice cases. There was hysteria and purported panic about certain medical specialists leaving the state because of high medical malpractice rates, particularly OB/GYN and neurosurgery. In his dissent, Justice Fischer explained that since the inception of statehood, Ohio legislative enactments were presumed to be constitutional, and the Court has repeatedly adopted the position that a law would be deemed unconstitutional only if proven so beyond a reasonable doubt. Top Ten Most Litigious States Percentage of Physicians Sued. Georgia Supreme Court ruled that the $350,000 cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases was unconstitutional. contact Greenberg and Bederman for a free legal consultation today. 0000011378 00000 n
Donald and Beverly Clark filed a lawsuit against Aimee Cain and AT&T for damages due to a car crash. Do not complete this field Instead, Mayo was told to follow up with her personal gynecologist for her history of uterine fibroids. But the emotional and psychological injuries suffered by these victims is real, substantial, and catastrophic, and may also manifest physically, she argued. She developed sepsis from the untreated infection. Or is he worth a lot more? Unlike some other states, Florida made provision for damage caps up to $1 million if the negligence of one or more practitioners resulted in a permanent vegetative state or death or if the court determined that because of special circumstances of the case the non-economic loss sustained by the injured person was particularly severe and the jury found the defendant's negligence caused a catastrophic injury to the patient. However, compensation for mental anguish and suffering of survivors can be limited by the state legislature. The jury awarded $20 million in compensatory damages for acts that occurred after April 2005, and $100 million inpunitive damages. The law also removes the cap for noneconomic loss if the plaintiff suffered permanent and substantial physical deformity, loss of use of a limb, loss of a bodily organ, or if the plaintiff is permanently prevented from being able to independently care for oneself. Judge Websters take on the constitutionality of damage caps seems well reasoned and hopefully will serve as a pre-cursor for the Mississippi Supreme Courts ruling. Webdamage cap statutes unconstitutional either altogether or in certain circumstances.5 Other states, like Mississippi, await decisions from state high courts regarding the constitutionality of the states damage caps.6 Successful challenges to the constitutionality of punitive damage cap statutes have also been rare, For this limited class of litigants people like Brandt who were victimized at a very young age and who bring civil actions to recover damages from the persons who have been found guilty of those intentional criminal acts the constitutional guarantee of due course of law is unjustly withheld, the Court stated. Tort damage caps unconstitutional when applied to sexually abused children, https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2022/SCO/1216/210497.asp#.Y6BubhXMKUk, Governor For Vacancies That May Occur Between Elections, Www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2022/sco/1216/210497.asp#.y6bubhxmkuk WebAn appeals court in Florida has declared that damage caps on monetary rewards limiting the recovery amounts of plaintiffs in medical malpractice lawsuits is unconstitutional. Contact us now for a FREE evaluation of your case. In 2005, Senate Bill 80 was signed into law and included R.C. Pompa sexually abused Brandt when she was 11 and 12 during sleepovers with his daughter. A difficult analysis, he maintained, due to the Courts decision in Simpkins v. Grace Brethren Church of Delaware, Ohio. The trial court had reduced the verdictto $22 million. Case Challenges Malpractice Caps as Being Unconstitutional Thejury was instructed on its duty to determine damages. The complication was not immediately discovered and she was sent home on pain medication only to be rushed back to the hospital for life-saving surgery. You have permission to edit this article. This decision is a total game changer for victims of medical malpractice in Florida. Haslam told the paper the governor's office was reviewing the judge's ruling. 0000116172 00000 n
As a result, the number of doctors participating in the compensation fund has increased every year. Those who argue in favor of tort reform assert that caps on damages are essential for protecting many facets of society from the crushing costs of unreasonable jury verdicts. If the State appeals, it could eventually "trigger[] a Tennessee Supreme Court review of Gov. The damage caps for non-economic losses were a significant change over the prior law which did not limit someone's recovery. The dissenters said that the majority was improperly substituting its policy preferences for that of the General Assembly. Those who argue in favor of tort reform assert that caps on damages are essential These factors include the reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct, the amount of punitive damages that would deter the defendant based on the defendant's wealth, and the nature of the plaintiff's injury. What documents are required for bail in India? The Utah malpractice act capped damages in a malpractice action at $450,000. Tort damage caps unconstitutional when applied to sexually abused children Law Limits Damage Awards to Personal Injury Victims. WebSouth Dakota Struck down cap on total damages, revived cap on non-economic damages Knowles ex. The Court of Appeals noted that the cap allows full awards This is when a state puts a limit in place on the amount of money that an injury victim can recoup in a lawsuit. Learn more WebUnconstitutional Damages Cap. Injury lawyers who were opposed to the caps argued it was, at most, debatable whether they would lower insurance rates or make a significant difference in the number of doctors choosing to practice here. Suite D ZIP Normil brought the infantto the hospital because of a high fever, vomiting, and a stiff neck. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. Judge Thomas rejected this argument. These cases currently include both appeals from courts of appeals affirming imposition of the death penalty by a trial court and, for capital crimes committed on or after Jan. 1, 1995, appeals taken directly from the trial courts. And the majority opinion does not dispute that the lines must be drawn it simply disagrees with how the General Assembly drew them., The dissent acknowledged that the Court can bring to the legislatures attention a statute that may no longer be in line with public interest, but it cannot rewrite the statute in the manner [it] find[s] most appropriate.. Copyright 2022, All Rights Reserved | National Trial Lawyers, Submit Settlement, Verdict, and Judgement, FL Court Reinstates $28.5M Verdict, Damage Caps Unconstitutional, Wood and Flooring Product Manufacturer Settle Class Action Lawsuit for $60M, Auto Parts Supplier to Pay $5.6M Over Wage Theft, DOJ Orders Bank to Pay $31M for Discriminating in Record Breaking Settlement, Instacart to Pay $5.25M in Workers Benefit Case, Landlord Pays $16M to Families of Three Women Deceased from Heat Exposure, Former Plant Operator Agrees to Pay $408 Million to Settle Lawsuits Over Toxic Exposures, Tribe Ordered to Pay Investors $88M Over Failed Casino Plans, Credit Unions to Pay Colorado $4M Over GAP Fees, Peloton Agrees to Pay $19M Over Treadmill Defects that Caused Injuries, Sephora Settles Class Action Tax Lawsuit for $1.77M, NJ Attorney General Announces $27M Settlement with Company Over Alleged Unlawful Practices, Nonprofit Settles Class Action Lawsuit for $3.5M Over Ransomware Attack, Utah Supreme Court Rules Damages Caps Unconstitutional, North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan. Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. for 365 days, $85.00
And second, the right to a jury trial was not violated when the trial court amended the damage award consistently with R.C. The District Court, following Florida case law, determined that future free or low-cost medical benefits, such as Medicare and Medicaid, are inadmissible as collateral sources of medical aid and were properly excluded from the trial. Donald and Beverly Clark filed a lawsuit against Aimee Cain and AT&T for damages due to a car crash. [sws_pullquote_left]See also: Utah Supreme Court Rules Damages Caps Unconstitutional [/sws_pullquote_left]. Majoritys Analysis of Caps for Abuse Victims Will Create Chaos in Courts, Dissent Predicts. While the future of damage caps in our state may soon be decided by the Mississippi Supreme Court when they announce their ruling in the case of Sears v.Learmonth, an interesting decision issued by Circuit Judge Charles Webster of Coahoma County provides an insightful perspective on why damage caps in tort cases may be unconstitutional. They also found the statute did not bear a rational relationship to the alleged medical malpractice crisis since the classification of awarding compensation under the statute unreasonably and arbitrarily limited recovery of those most grievously injured by medical negligence. A claim is frivolous when the claim lacks any arguable basis either in law or in fact Neitze v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). In medical malpractice cases, for example, tort reform is seen as one way of helping to keep down the skyrocketing costs of medical care. The effect of the court's ruling is to remove the damage caps on medical malpractice cases which occur after the date of the decision. 0000002442 00000 n
The Utah constitution says damages that can be recovered for injuries shall not be subject to any statutory limitation., This case is Gregory Lynn Smith v. United States of America, Case no. 0000002716 00000 n
The Utah malpractice act capped damages in a malpractice action at $450,000. Two Justices are chosen at the general election in even-numbered years.
Writing for the Court majority, Chief Justice Maureen OConnor noted the Court previously ruled the 2005 state tort reform laws provision capping losses for harder-to-prove noneconomic damages was constitutional because exceptions were allowed for those who suffered permanent and substantial physical injuries. The morning of what would have been his second day home, Smiths roommate found him dead. We need to hold dangerous doctors accountable for the injuries they cause. The couple asked for $22.5 million in damages for pain and suffering, far exceeding the state's cap for non-economic damages. 0000009713 00000 n
CAPS ON COMPENSATORY DAMAGES: A STATE LAW SUMMARY (August 2020 Update) (DOWNLOAD PDF) It is difficult to compare state laws that cap compensation to victims in civil lawsuits. Recovery for the economic and noneconomic damages existed at the timethatthe state constitution was created and thus the damages are protected from legislative caps. For example, if a doctor is sued for medical malpractice, the doctor's medical malpractice insurance company may pay the resulting damages. We've Got You Covered! Florida had enacted limits on the recovery for survivors of victims of medical malpractice cases which placed similar caps on their non-economic losses. Best of luck. If you can imagine having a loved one taken from you due to a preventable medical mistake, and then being told that under the law, this loved one was only worth a certain fixed dollar amount, then you can put yourself in the shoes of hundreds of people in 30 out of the 50 states. In a 4-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled caps on noneconomic damages This case was decided in the 2nd district court of Florida. Heres a shiny 50 cent piece for you. Her esophagus was punctured during the surgery. The Court today stated that the cap in the tort reform law is unconstitutional as applied to sexually abused children like Brandt because the law overlooked a small class of plaintiffs who are arbitrarily excluded from recovering the full amount of noneconomic damages awarded by a jury. As an adult, Brandt filed a civil lawsuit in 2018 against Pompa for intentional criminal wrongdoing, knowing dissemination of child pornography, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. How would you like to discuss your particular case with the attorneys at Greenberg & Bederman? Smith had undergone two surgeries beforehis treatment at the VA Medical Center. A state law capping the amount of damages awarded for claims such as pain and suffering in a personal injury lawsuit is Lawsuit Challenges Application of Caps to Child Victims. However, neither the doctor nor the physician assistant told Mayo about the diagnosis or the available treatment. If a surgeon makes the wrong cut and as a result you cant drive anymore, would it simply be enough to get the equivalent of cab fare? Rule 11(a) essentially lays down that a plaint is liable to be rejected by the court if such a cause of action, upon which the whole suit is founded is not specified therein. The District court granted Pierre and Normils cross-appeal on the issue of the caps of noneconomic damages. hb```b``e`c`` @Q L< Ul F-c4T'15X921h&. Legal Definition of tort reform : change or alteration of laws imposing civil liability for torts especially to limit liability for punitive damages. Damage caps do both of these things. The ruling by the Florida Supreme Court was not a dramatic surprise because of their 2014 ruling in the McCall case which found the cap on non-economic damages in wrongful death cases unjustly and unreasonably treated survivors of wrongful death actions differently. This came a month after the Illinois Supreme Court made a similar ruling. Results 0000001116 00000 n
While there was never a limit on economic damages, the actual cost of medical care, lost earning and other financial losses, no longer will insurance companies be in a position of avoiding full responsibility for compensating medical malpractice victims for the full measure of their non-economic damages as well. What You Need to Know. We help victims of car accidents,medical malpractice and victims of faulty and dangerous prescription drugs on a daily basis. WebUnited States, 544 N.W.2d 183 (S.D. WebThe court in Kalitan found the damage scheme outlined in the statute was unconstitutional because it violated equal protection under the Florida Constitution since there was no The law, which is the first of its kind, expressly prohibits reductions of damages for lost future earnings in personal injury and wrongful death cases when those reductions are based on race, gender or ethnicity. Plaintiff Gregory Lynn Smith filed a medical malpractice suit in 2010 against the VA medical center in Utah after his son, Gregory Lee Smith, died of an acute drug intoxication. The laws cap on noneconomic damages was challenged shortly after its enactment. The opinion stated the type of injuries Brandt sustained are extremely uncommon and that most business liability insurance policies now exclude coverage for intentional conduct such as abuse or molestation. However, the Court of Appeals noted the cap doesnt achieve any of the Legislatures stated goals in adopting it. The Florida Supreme Court recently found in its 2014 Estate of McCall v. United States decision there was no evidence these caps had any effect on lowering malpractice insurance premium doctors were paying. While those are the type of injuries suffered by adults in most personal injury cases, child victims of sexual abuse differ. The trial court reduced the non-economic damages to $250,000 due to the statutory limits of K.S.A. His conviction demonstrated that her lawsuit was not frivolous, the opinion noted. WebFor example, if a doctor is sued for medical malpractice, the doctor's medical malpractice insurance company may pay the resulting damages. Chief Justice OConnor explained that in the Arbino case, the plaintiffs claimed the caps on noneconomic damages were unconstitutional in all circumstances. Caps were as low as $500,000 for cases brought against an individual practitioner, such as an orthopedic surgeon or general surgeon. 0000001923 00000 n
Promotional Rates were found for your code. al., case number 4D13-88 in the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Fourth District. Brandt appealed to the Supreme Court of Ohio, which agreed to review the case. Economic losses are described as lost wages and salaries, along with expenditures for medical care and treatment, rehabilitation, and other expenses incurred as a result of an injury or death. Statutory Cap means the maximum amount of sales and use tax exclusion the Authority may grant pursuant to Section 26011.8(h) of the Public Resources Code. from Jacksonville to By Debra Cassens Weiss. This sad story had a somewhat happy ending when a jury held the negligent health care providers accountable. The "medical malpractice insurance CRISIS" described below was the same justification for passing Texas' $250,000 damages cap for pain and suffering in med mal cases. Sorry, there are no recent results for popular images. Plaintiffs argue that the damage caps usurp the jurys function and deprive plaintiffs of their day in court. By Dan Trevas | December 16, 2022. As a result, it was appealed to the Florida Supreme Court, which issued its ruling on June 8, 2017, finding that the medical malpractice caps were unconstitutional. Punitive damages are designed to prevent others from being hurt by the same or similar actions. Pierre and his Mother cross-appealed, arguing that caps on noneconomic damages are unconstitutional. And [i]n order to effectively enact legislation that solves the problems that the General Assembly found to exist, the legislature was required to draw lines somewhere., That the distinctions drawn may not be perfect does not make them irrational or arbitrary, the dissent stated. So-called tort reformers push for more and more damage caps to be enacted under state law, while attorneys and consumer rights advocates make every attempt to prevent these caps from being enacted. Contact us. We are happy to share the newsthat the1st District Court of Appealsin Wisconsin ruled that acap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases is unconstitutional because it imposes an unfair and illogical burden only on catastrophically injured patients, thus denying them the equal protection of the laws.. Sorry we wrecked your life, kid. Judge Webster reasons that if the legislature has the ability to set damage cap limitations it also has the ability to completely pre-empt judges of any ability to compensate victims of negligent conduct. These are questions that should be debated and settled in courts, not mandated by unfair and arbitrary laws. The Court of Appeals noted that the cap allows full awards for less severely injured patients but results in reduced awards for the catastrophically injured. Do not complete this field Bill Haslam's 2011 tort reform initiative," the Chattanooga Times Free Press reports. 2021-0497. Law Limits Damage Awards to Personal Injury Victims. Under that test, the Court assesses whether a statute is not unreasonable or arbitrary., In Arbino, the Court found the caps, along with the exception to the caps for severe physical injury, met the rational-basis test because the legislature concluded that catastrophic injuries offer more concrete evidence of noneconomic damages and thus calculation of those damages poses a lesser risk of being tainted by improper external considerations., Chief Justice OConnor today wrote that the significant distinction between the facts in Arbino and in Brandts cases is that psychological injuries were not addressed in Arbino. ";s:7:"keyword";s:28:"damage caps unconstitutional";s:5:"links";s:733:"Kim Fields On Blue Bloods,
Friedrich Scharnhorst,
Rude Bear Jokes,
Missing Persons Rochester Ny 2020,
Wrestlers Managed By Skandor Akbar,
Articles D
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}